Home  |  What's New  |  Photos  |  Histories  |  Headstones  |  Reports  |  Surnames
 


First/Given Name(s):


Last/Surname:



BRASSFIELD Betty
Female 1858 - 1949

HomeHome    SearchSearch    PrintPrint    Login - User: anonymousLogin    Add BookmarkAdd Bookmark

Personal Information    |    Notes    |    All    |    PDF

  • Birth  Abt 1858 
    Gender  Female 
    Residence  1944  Mississippi Delta Find all individuals with events at this location 
    Residence  1944  Mississippi delta area Find all individuals with events at this location 
    Died  Abt 1949  California, USA Find all individuals with events at this location 
    Person ID  I29248  Brasfield-Brassfield Genealogies
    Last Modified  17 Feb 2015 
     
    Father  BRASSFIELD James Augustus,   b. 23 Jun 1837, Alabama, USA Find all individuals with events at this location,   d. 24 Jul 1926, Houston, Chickasaw, Mississippi, USA Find all individuals with events at this location 
    Mother  TURNAGE Mary Eilzabeth,   b. 16 Jul 1842, Clay, Mississippi, USA Find all individuals with events at this location,   d. 15 Sep 1911 
    Family ID  F10516  Group Sheet
     
    Family  MORGAN Unknown,   b. Abt 1858,   d. Bef 1944 
    Family ID  F9024  Group Sheet
     
  • Notes 
    • Belle Brassfield marries George W. Morgan 23 Oct 1882 in Clay Co, MS per the IGI In the IGI also is Rowena E. Brassfield marrying James M. Morgan 22 Dec 1881 in Clay Co. In the 1870 Chickasaw Co, MS census Rowena E. is listed with James and Mary Brassfield. I believe Rowena E. (possibly Elizabeth) is Betty. We have in oral family history that Betty Brassfield married Jim Morgan and they were living in the Delta area in the 1930's. Annie Brassfield, last dau of James and Mary is shown as born in Clay Co, MS so it appears that the parents moved to Clay Co, from Chickasaw between 1870 and 1877 (or the county boundaries changed) and it is logical that Belle and Betty were married in Clay Co, in 1881 and 1882. With so many Morgan's around several counties in NW MS, I haven't sorted out which families James and George belong to yet. I don't think they are brothers, so perhaps cousins, but no real evidence to support this yet. Thanks for posting the photo. Maybe we will all learn something from it. Mary KARTURK@aol.com